How should a barrister respond when a client asks for accommodation that compromises ethics?

• A. Agree to accommodation regardless of ethics.
• B. Delay decision and avoid giving a clear answer.
• C. Explain the ethical limitations, offer alternatives, and consider withdrawal if necessary.
• D. Pursue the accommodation by marketing it as a client benefit.

Answer: (B)

When a client asks for something that would compromise ethics, the key is to maintain ethical integrity while guiding the client within permissible boundaries. The best approach is to explain the ethical limits clearly, propose alternatives that stay within those rules, and, if needed, consider withdrawal to avoid facilitating wrongdoing. This shows respect for the profession’s duties and helps the client pursue lawful avenues rather than crossing ethical lines.

Delaying or avoiding a clear answer isn’t appropriate because it leaves the client uncertain and can allow the improper request to drift forward. Agreeing to the accommodation would breach ethical duties. Marketing the accommodation as a client benefit would be misleading and unethical.