Under Rule 78, what must a barrister do if informed during the case that the client lied before judgment?

Get ready for the Queensland Bar Ethics Examination with multiple-choice questions, detailed explanations, and important study aids to ensure you pass your exam confidently!

Multiple Choice

Under Rule 78, what must a barrister do if informed during the case that the client lied before judgment?

Explanation:
When a barrister learns that the client lied before judgment, the duty is to balance candour to the court with respecting the client’s instructions. Rule 78 directs that the barrister first approach the client and seek consent to inform the court about the lie. If the client agrees, the barrister can disclose the truth to the court and continue the matter appropriately. If the client refuses, the barrister must withdraw from the case rather than continuing to represent someone who intends to rely on false evidence. This protects the integrity of the proceedings while preserving as much confidentiality as possible and avoids the barrister facilitating deception. Informing the court immediately without client consent would bypass the client’s instructions and confidentiality, doing nothing fails to address the need to correct the record, and informing the client alone does not rectify the situation with the court.

When a barrister learns that the client lied before judgment, the duty is to balance candour to the court with respecting the client’s instructions. Rule 78 directs that the barrister first approach the client and seek consent to inform the court about the lie. If the client agrees, the barrister can disclose the truth to the court and continue the matter appropriately. If the client refuses, the barrister must withdraw from the case rather than continuing to represent someone who intends to rely on false evidence. This protects the integrity of the proceedings while preserving as much confidentiality as possible and avoids the barrister facilitating deception.

Informing the court immediately without client consent would bypass the client’s instructions and confidentiality, doing nothing fails to address the need to correct the record, and informing the client alone does not rectify the situation with the court.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy