What is the key principle from Bale v Mills about submitting material after a hearing?

Get ready for the Queensland Bar Ethics Examination with multiple-choice questions, detailed explanations, and important study aids to ensure you pass your exam confidently!

Multiple Choice

What is the key principle from Bale v Mills about submitting material after a hearing?

Explanation:
The key idea is that after a hearing has taken place, you should not introduce any new material to the court without obtaining leave. Bale v Mills sits behind this rule, emphasizing that the record should not be expanded with late submissions unless the judge explicitly allows it. This keeps the process fair and orderly: once the hearing is finished, the court’s attention is on the material already before it, and any fresh material could disrupt the balance between the parties or surprise the other side. If the court grants leave, late material can be admitted and considered, but without such permission it should not be placed before the court.

The key idea is that after a hearing has taken place, you should not introduce any new material to the court without obtaining leave. Bale v Mills sits behind this rule, emphasizing that the record should not be expanded with late submissions unless the judge explicitly allows it. This keeps the process fair and orderly: once the hearing is finished, the court’s attention is on the material already before it, and any fresh material could disrupt the balance between the parties or surprise the other side. If the court grants leave, late material can be admitted and considered, but without such permission it should not be placed before the court.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy