When may a party make further submissions after a hearing in VirginTel v Zabusky?

Get ready for the Queensland Bar Ethics Examination with multiple-choice questions, detailed explanations, and important study aids to ensure you pass your exam confidently!

Multiple Choice

When may a party make further submissions after a hearing in VirginTel v Zabusky?

Explanation:
After a hearing, the court controls whether any extra arguments are considered. In VirginTel v Zabusky, a party may make further submissions only if the court requests them or leave is granted. This keeps the process efficient and ensures the judge can decide based on the materials before them without open-ended filings. If no invitation or permission is given, additional submissions shouldn’t be filed. The other options don’t fit because they either assume an automatic right to submit more after the hearing, or deny any post-hearing submissions, or inaccurately tie permission to something like only written submissions. If you need to add more after a hearing, you must obtain the court’s request or obtain leave.

After a hearing, the court controls whether any extra arguments are considered. In VirginTel v Zabusky, a party may make further submissions only if the court requests them or leave is granted. This keeps the process efficient and ensures the judge can decide based on the materials before them without open-ended filings. If no invitation or permission is given, additional submissions shouldn’t be filed. The other options don’t fit because they either assume an automatic right to submit more after the hearing, or deny any post-hearing submissions, or inaccurately tie permission to something like only written submissions. If you need to add more after a hearing, you must obtain the court’s request or obtain leave.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy